#Sam angela gold gia bao nhieu 1 hop 1080p
#Sam angela gold gia bao nhieu 1 hop iso
#Sam angela gold gia bao nhieu 1 hop professional

#Sam angela gold gia bao nhieu 1 hop 1080p

These days, cropped 4K/30p is hardly impressive, especially with mirrorless models offering 4K/60p that use the full sensor.īut it’s better than the Canon EOS 6D Mark II which only allows for 1080p shooting up to 60 fps. Unfortunately, the DCI 4K video also came with a significant (1.6x) crop, which meant that wide-angle shooting is limited. However, the Canon 6D Mark II’s dynamic range performance is rather dismal, offering around 12 stops – which is worse than its predecessor, the original 6D.įor landscape photographers or anyone who’s frequently faced with HDR situations, the 6D Mark II just isn’t ideal.Īt the time of its release, the Canon 5D Mark IV offered good video capabilities: Cinema 4K up to 30p and 1080p video up to 60 fps.

The 5D Mark IV offers around 13+ stops of DR, which is decent for a full-frame, high-end camera body, but nothing impressive (and nowhere near the 14+ specs offered by Nikon and Sony). Where the 5D Mark IV really separates itself from the 6D Mark II, however, is in terms of dynamic range (see guide).

#Sam angela gold gia bao nhieu 1 hop iso

Images stay usable through ISO 6400, though I wouldn’t recommend ISO 12800 shots unless you’re ready to do a lot of post-processing or you don’t mind the noisy aesthetic. The 5D Mark IV has always been seen as Canon’s affordable low-light option for professionals, beating out cameras such as its predecessor (the 5D Mark III) and tying with the Nikon D750.īut while the Canon EOS 6D Mark II isn’t necessarily known for low-light shooting the way the 5D Mark IV is, looking at high-ISO RAWs side-by-side, I can see very little difference.īoth cameras hold up well until ISO 1600, where a small amount of noise becomes apparent. In terms of high-ISO image quality, the RAW files on both cameras are pretty comparable. But the 4 MP increase on the 5D Mark IV can make a slight difference when it comes to large, high-resolution printing, as well as cropping options. The 6D Mark II packs 26.2 MP while the 5D Mark IV features 30.4 MP.īoth these megapixel counts are going to be enough for basically every amateur and should also be able to satisfy the needs of most professionals.

With the exception of the Canon 5DS/5DS R pair, the Canon 6D Mark II and Canon 5D Mark IV are Canon’s two highest-resolution DSLRs: Unfortunately, the 6D Mark II and 5D Mark IV could use some work in terms of their buffers: 19 RAW on the 5D Mark IV and 21 RAW on the 6D Mark II is far from impressive and is thoroughly trounced by modern mirrorless competitors.

Neither spec is jaw-dropping, but 7 fps is going to be just enough for amateur action photographers. The 5D Mark IV also manages to eke out a win in terms of continuous shooting speeds: You get 7 fps, compared to 6.5 fps on the 6D Mark II. It’s big, it’s sharp, and it looks incredible. Compare this to the 3.2”, 1620K-dot LCD on the 5D Mark IV. On the 6D Mark II, you get a standard 3” rear LCD, with 1040K dots.

#Sam angela gold gia bao nhieu 1 hop professional

The 5D Mark IV, on the other hand, is firmly a professional camera and it has a viewfinder and LCD to go with that designation. The Canon 6D Mark II is decent in terms of viewfinder and LCD performance, but nothing special. The one area where the 6D Mark II soundly beats the 5D Mark IV is in terms of the LCD handling: The rear screen is fully articulating, which means that you can twist it into odd angles for vlogging, architectural photography, macro photography, and much more. For photographers who always need to produce two copies of their images, this is going to be a dealbreaker. Note that the 5D Mark IV does offer two card slots: a CF slot and an SD slot, compared to the single SD slot on the 6D Mark II. You’re also going to like the touchscreen options on both cameras which allow you to determine AF placement in Live View. But both bodies are well-built and can withstand some bumps and bruises. The 5D Mark IV is going to offer the more professional build overall its magnesium alloy construction will hold up better than the 6D Mark II’s mix of aluminum alloy and polycarbonate. Neither one feels remotely plastic but instead operate as solid, weather-sealed bodies. In terms of handling: You’re going to feel good with either one in your hands, though as I mentioned in the previous section, the 5D Mark IV does have a bigger handgrip – and this allows for a slightly comfortable feeling overall.īy the way, part of the reasons both these cameras feel great in your hands is the build-quality.